Community discussion: Should the DAO introduce a community-based decision-making process for early-stage projects to set up a pTokens bridge? If so, what should the requirements (financial, technical, growth, etc) for those projects be?

Discussion
6

DAO might be able to manage this if:

  • The applicant team prepare proper whitepaper, project introduction, business case to sustain the application
  • The development is paid by the DAO at fixed price - the development team should provide the size of the Grant and the DAO should define if the applicant team should pay to the DAO with or without a markup (+) or an incentive (-)
  • In the case the go is for an incentive, the DAO should gain directly from the bridge implementation
  • To have the DAO properly evaluate then, the DAO should get part of the fees in its treasury or have some earnings from the initial markup
  • The DAO should have a strategy to manage the treasury (eg. to cover any damage for users, like recent events, unlikely, suggest to consider)

If the DAO doesn’t earn directly from the bridge, makes no sense to let the DAO decide because decision might be not conscious - just a click to get the period rewards.

All of this added to your 4 points.
Hope this stimulate the discussion.

1 Like